Why FairShift

The incumbents got big. They didn't get fair.

Legacy enterprise schedulers like QGenda solve coverage and compliance, then bolt on modules for everything else. FairShift starts from the thing they treat as an afterthought: whether the people working the schedule can see why it came out the way it did.

FairShift

Legacy suites

Fairness & preference engine

✓Core of the product, for every user

•A premium module, if offered at all

Equity that carries across cycles

✓Running ledger of who’s owed

•Resets each period; tracked by memory

Per-assignment explanation

✓Every shift shows its reason

•Little to no transparency for staff

Time to go live

✓Weeks, self-serve

•Months, with services engagement

Pricing

✓Simple, readable on one line

•Per-module, quote-based, opaque

Scope

✓One job: the schedule and its reasons

•Broad suite, uneven depth

Comparison reflects the general positioning of large enterprise scheduling suites versus FairShift's single-purpose approach.

Fairness in the core

Preference logic and the equity ledger aren't a premium tier. They're the product. Everyone who works a shift gets the fairness engine. No license gate.

Weeks, not quarters

No implementation team, no statement-of-work, no professional-services invoice. Import your team, set your rules, and run a real draft in weeks.

One thing, done right

We don't sell a suite. We build one scheduling engine, and we keep it simple to price, adopt, and defend.

Switching from a legacy tool? That's usually the easy part.

Bring your rosters and rules. We'll have a covered draft in front of your team before a legacy rollout would have finished kickoff.